Lesson Plans Based on Movies & Film Clips!                                         

Terms of Use  TWM Blog 



LEARNING GUIDE TO:

12 ANGRY MEN

SUBJECTS — U.S./1945 - 1991 & The Law;
SOCIAL-EMOTIONAL LEARNING — Justice;
MORAL-ETHICAL EMPHASIS — Fairness; Respect; Citizenship.

1957 Version: Age: 11+; No MPAA Rating; Drama; 96 minutes; B & W; Available from Amazon.com.

1997 Version: Age: 11+; MPAA Rating -- PG-13 for language; Drama; 117 minutes; Color. Available from Amazon.com.


Description: These movies depict jury deliberations in a murder trial. The first vote is 11 to 1 to convict but through rational argument and persuasion, bias and prejudice are overcome and justice is done. Both films are excellent, however the original black and white version is better in terms of artistic merit than the 1997 remake.

Rationale for Using the Movie: 12 Angry Men shows a reasonable approximation of what happens behind the closed doors of the jury room and the dynamic of jury deliberations.

Objectives/Student Outcomes Using this Learning Guide: Students will be introduced to the inner workings of the American jury system and will be motivated to do their best on research and writing assignments. The film can also be used to introduce the concept of due process in the legal system.

Possible Problems: None. The jury is all-male; the play on which the film is based was made in the days when women were not allowed to serve on juries in most jurisdictions. There is some profanity.







 


LEARNING GUIDE MENU


Rationale and Objectives
Possible Problems
Parenting Points

Using the Movie in Class:
      Introduction to the Movie
      Discussion Questions
      Assignments

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS
IN A SEPARATE DOCUMENT


Helpful Background

Additional Discussion Questions:
      Subjects (Curriculum Topics)
      Social-Emotional Learning
      Moral-Ethical Emphasis
            (Character Counts)

Other Sections:
      CCSS Anchor Standards
      Selected Awards & Cast



WORKSHEETS: TWM offers the following worksheets to keep students' minds on the movie and direct them to the lessons that can be learned from the film. Teachers can modify the worksheets to fit the needs of each class. See also TWM's Historical Fiction in Film Cross-Curricular Homework Project and Movies as Literature Homework Project.

Additional ideas for lesson plans for this movie can be found at TWM's guide to Lesson Plans Using Film Adaptations of Novels, Short Stories or Plays.
SUGGESTIONS FOR USING 12 ANGRY MEN IN THE CLASSROOM


Introduction to the Movie and Closing:

Before showing the movie, tell the class that the film shows a realistic view of jury deliberations.

At the end of the movie, tell the class that the conviction of innocent people is still a serious problem in the United States. For example, in 2000 the governor of Illinois issued a moratorium on death sentences in his state because more than 13 people who had been convicted and sentenced to death were later found to be innocent and at least one innocent man had been executed.

Discussion Questions:

After the film has been watched, engage the class in a discussion about the movie.

1.   The dissenting juror may have suspected that the young man actually did kill his father. Why does he still argue that the young man should be acquitted of the charges? Suggested Response: The dissenting juror understands that a conviction requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt and he pursues his doubts relentlessly yet patiently and with respect for the other juror's opinions.

2.   What are some of the policy reasons underlying the requirement that before a person can be convicted of a crime, every member of a jury vote for conviction? Suggested Response: Students will give answers based on the movie, referring to the jurors who wanted to go to the ball game or who were prejudiced for some reason against the defendant. Guide the discussion to the following points: the state is powerful and has many resources and because often individuals accused of a crime have few ways to protect themselves, the state is held to a high burden when it tries to fine or imprison someone. This is the same reason why the state must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. These requirements result in some guilty people going free, but it is better for that to happen than to wrongfully convict, fine, or imprison even one person who is innocent. Experience shows that even with the protections of due process, some innocent people are convicted or are forced into plea bargains. The rates of erroneous convictions would soar if the government was not required to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt to every one of the jurors hearing the case.

3.  What is "due process of law" and why is it important? Suggested Response: Even students who have not formally studied the concept of due process should have an intuitive understanding of the concept. Guide the discussion to the concepts that follow.

Due process:
  • is a set of procedures designed to make sure that people are treated fairly by the government;
  • is based on the idea that a person cannot be deprived of life, liberty or property without appropriate legal procedures and safeguards;
  • includes, at least, the right to notice, an opportunity to be heard, and protection from an unreasonable or capricious result;
  • is a flexible concept and requires different procedures in different situations; for example, the due process requirements for a criminal case are more stringent than due process requirements for a civil case because a criminal conviction carries potential incarceration, a heavier punishment than mere loss of money; and
  • requires more protections in a court case than in an administrative proceeding; in an administrative hearing the decision must be reasonable but it doesn't have to meet the standards of beyond a reasonable doubt or even a preponderance of the evidence.

Due process is more than just important. It is essential in a government of ordered liberty because it is important to individuals that when government makes a decision affecting them, that the decision be made fairly. If the government takes action without due process, it will lose the loyalty of its citizens.


4.   What would you think about due process if a member of your family was killed and the killer was acquitted because the prosecutor made mistakes and did not prove his case? Suggested Response: Obviously, one would be angry and upset. A good answer will recognize that the system of justice is not perfect and that sometimes we don't get perfect justice. Turn the question, how would they feel if their relative or they themselves were accused of a crime they did not commit and then they were convicted and had to go to jail?

For seven additional discussion questions, click here.




Assignments:

Any of the discussion questions can serve as a writing prompt. Additional assignments include:

1. Research the evolution of the Innocence Project and present the information to the class as an example of how often trials can result in wrongful conviction. Use a Power Point format and include your sources of information.

2. Look up the concept of "due process" and write a formal essay in which you evaluate the film in terms of its adherence to the principle of "fundamental fairness."

3. Write a newspaper account of the process by which the jurors determined that the accused in the case described in 12 Angry Men was innocent of the crime. You may want to make up quotes and attribute comments to various jurors that explain why they voted for or against conviction and ultimately changed their minds.

See also Additional Assignments for Use With any Film that is a Work of Fiction.

 





This film is one of a triumvirate which help students understand due process. The other two are The Ox-Bow Incident and Stand and Deliver. See also Plea Bargaining in the American Justice System, Using a Clip from the film American Violet.





See TWM's Short Essay on Due Process in the Trial of Criminal Cases.





BUILDING VOCABULARY: "burden of proof," "due process of law," "presumption of innocence," "circumstantial evidence," "beyond a reasonable doubt."







Select questions that are appropriate for your students.









Parenting Points: Watch the movie with your child and assure your child that situations have occurred when one juror has turned a jury around.







Reminder to Teachers: Obtain all required permissions from your school administration before showing any film.

Teachers who want parental permission to show this movie can use TWM's Movie Permission Slip.



This Learning Guide written by James Frieden and Mary RedClay and was last updated on August 12, 2013.




Spread the GOOD NEWS about

TEACHWITHMOVIES.COM!



 

© TeachWithMovies.com, Inc. All rights reserved. Note that unless otherwise indicated any quotations attributed to a source, photographs, illustrations, maps, diagrams or paintings were copied from public domain sources or are included based upon the "fair use" doctrine. No claim to copyright is made as to those items. DVD or VHS covers are in the public domain. TeachWithMovies.org®, TeachWithMovies.com®, Talking and Playing with Movies™, and the pencil and filmstrip logo are trademarks of TeachWithMovies.com, Inc.

TWM grants free limited licenses to copy TWM curriculum materials only to educators in public or non-profit schools and to parents trying to help educate their children. See TWM's Terms of Use for a full description of the free licenses and limits on the rights of others to copy TWM.