Suggested Answers to Discussion Questions for
Learning Guide to FAHRENHEIT 451
1. See Discussion Questions for Use With any Film that is a Work of Fiction.
2. Why was the government shown in this film afraid of people reading books? Suggested Response: The government wanted to control what the people read and many, if not most, of the books written in the past did not fit into the party line.
3. What was the reason that this society gave for eliminating books? Suggested Response: It claimed that books contained views and statements that were offensive or demeaning to one group or another.
4. What do you think of the reason the government gave for eliminating books? Suggested Response: It was just an excuse. The best way to eliminate prejudice is education and more speech in which people challenge the prejudice of others, not less speech. The real reason the government didn't want people to read was that it wanted to control what the people thought and the books did not fit into the party line.
5. What were the negative effects of the decision by the society shown in the film to eliminate books? What, if any, were the positive effects of that decision? Suggested Response: It stopped people from expanding their minds, learning about their world and their past, and enjoying the beauty that was in books. There were no positive effects of this decision. The best way to eliminate prejudice is education and more speech in which people challenge those who are prejudiced, not less speech.
6. What was the role of television in the wife's life? Suggested Response: The purpose of television was to entertain, to fill the time without allowing the viewer to think, and to make up for some of the richness of life that was lost when books were taken away.
7. This world seems very strange to us, but put yourself back in 1900 and list ten of the most important changes that have occurred since that time. In light of that list, is the society envisioned by this movie so farfetched? Suggested Response: In 1900, we had the telephone and the telegraph. Cars were a curiosity as was radio, and they didn't touch the lives of most people. Here is our list of ten. Students should be encouraged to make up their own list. Our ten include: (1) mass produced cars; (2) motion pictures; (3) radio; (4) television; (5) X-rays; (6) nuclear power for peace and war; (7) cell phones; (8) sound recording devices; (9) antibiotics; and (10) computers.
8. Compare the role of drugs in Montague's society and alcohol (a mind altering drug) in the former Soviet Union. Did you know that one of the first reforms of Gorbachev, the man responsible for dismantling the Soviet state, was a package of laws designed to discourage the consumption of alcohol? Suggested Response: We don't know the answer to this question. Certainly, alcoholics are not great social activists. Many of them just sit in their drunken stupors.
9. What would life be like if there were no books? Suggested Response: There is no one correct response. Our response is that life would be dull and much less rich than it is with books.
10. The German poet Heinrich Heine said, "Where books are burned, they will also ultimately burn human beings." What did he mean by this? Suggested Response: Burning books is a technique of governments and groups of people who don't want free expression of ideas. But ideas ultimately come from people, who have a habit of talking about their ideas. So, if you are going to burn books to limit the spread of ideas you will soon have to kill people because people are the source of ideas and they will not stop thinking.
11. If all of the books that have been written over the centuries suddenly disappeared and all computer memory that had copies of books were destroyed, what would we have lost? Suggested Response: We would have lost much of our cultural heritage and the way to transmit our knowledge about the world and the past.
12. Did Montague have to kill the captain in order to escape? What is the literary significance of burning the captain? Suggested Response: The captain could have been neutralized in any number of ways short of death. The irony of the manner of his death is that he was the spokesman for the book burners.
13. There is no real threat in modern society that books will be destroyed wholesale. Instead, certain people and organizations would ban certain books or types of books. Do you agree or disagree with the proposition that banning any book is bad? What about "Mein Kampf?" What about a book that described how to make an atomic bomb and that extolled the misguided ideology of the September 11, 2001 World Trade Center hijackers? What about a book aimed at teenagers that falsely, but convincingly, argued that a dangerous drug, for example Ecstasy, could be taken without a risk of harmful effects? If you come out on the side of banning any books, describe who would set the criteria to determine which books should be banned and who would decide if, for any particular book those criteria applied. Suggested Response: There is no one answer to these questions.
Social-Emotional Learning Discussion Questions:
ALCOHOL AND DRUG ABUSE
1. Why did the society shown in this film supply the wife with drugs? Suggested Response: To keep her from feeling her unhappiness. In any group of unhappy people some will ultimately agitate for change.
2. What was the role of television and drugs in the society shown in this film and how did they support each other? Suggested Response: They both served the same purpose, social control.
3. How would interactive computer games fit into the world of "Fahrenheit 451"? Suggested Response: They can be just another type of television or drug.
Moral-Ethical Emphasis Discussion Questions (Character Counts)
Discussion Questions Relating to Ethical Issues will facilitate the use of this film to teach ethical principles and critical viewing. Additional questions are set out below.
(Treat others with respect; follow the Golden Rule; Be tolerant of differences; Use good manners, not bad language; Be considerate of the feelings of others; Don't threaten, hit or hurt anyone; Deal peacefully with anger, insults and disagreements)
1. Did this society respect the opinions of its people? Describe the reasons for your answer. Suggested Response: The society didn't respect the opinions of people because it sought only to dull thei minds and it did not allow them the tools (books, ideas) with which to develop and evauate their own ideas.
Last updated May 22, 2008.
Spread the GOOD NEWS about